Manual safety changed while carrying LC9s & SR9c? - Page 2

Manual safety changed while carrying LC9s & SR9c?

This is a discussion on Manual safety changed while carrying LC9s & SR9c? within the General Firearm Discussion forums, part of the General Category category; Originally Posted by davevabch Same here, Just totally natural. It would not bother me one bit to have a safety on a LCP. I really ...

Like Tree6Likes

Thread: Manual safety changed while carrying LC9s & SR9c?

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 13 of 13
  1. #11 Re: Manual safety changed while carrying LC9s & SR9c? 
    Jr. Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2017
    Posts
    45
    Quote Originally Posted by davevabch View Post
    Same here, Just totally natural. It would not bother me one bit to have a safety on a LCP. I really would not own the SR9C or LC9S without a safety. After so many years of training with a safety, I feel naked without one. A Glock would drive me totally insane
    Ditto that. Im just like Dave and Denny. Every pistol I own with a safety has a safety lever on the left side that needs to be in the down position to fire except my SR22. That gun is up for off position (was told that it has to do with fitting a decocker in that small form factor). So sweeping is second nature for me. A safety on an LCP wouldn't bother me one bit. The fact that the DA on my Custom does not have a safety does not bother me. I pretend it's there. I have a Glock 17 as well but don't carry or holster it - range only.


    Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
    davevabch likes this.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  2. #12 Re: Manual safety changed while carrying LC9s & SR9c? 
    Super Member davevabch's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Location
    The Garden of Good and Evil
    Posts
    2,510
    Interest to see this new Product for the Glock Firearms. It appears that even Glock owners are finally starting to find some common sense to safety. I do not know all about the device, but it appears to be worth every penny they want from it. If there was NOT a issue, this product would never have come into existence. While this "Gadget is not a complete safety, he is a beginning. If you own a Glock, I cannot imagine that you would NOT want to have this installed by your Gunsmith.



    https://www.facebook.com/commerce/pr...7738219667560/
    ETS likes this.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  3. #13 Re: Manual safety changed while carrying LC9s & SR9c? 
    ETS
    ETS is online now
    Sr. Member ETS's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2017
    Location
    Cincinnati, Oh
    Posts
    342
    Very interesting--The Gadget--seems it would improve the safety against an ND, particularly when reholstering. Wonder what other observations/experience others might have. Thanks, davevabch.
    davevabch likes this.
    ETS
    ++++(Ed)++++
    Rugers presently owned: LCP II, LC9S(semi-pro), Convertible Single Six (x2), Mark II, M77(.223), Mini-14
    NRA Benefactor
    Freedom 's Never Free
    Cowards die many times before their deaths; The valiant taste of death but once.
    I think the surest sign that intelligent life exists elsewhere in the universe is that none of it has tried to contact us.
    Reply With Quote  
     

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Home | Forum | Active Topics | What's New
Ads
Posting Permissions
  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Similar Threads

  1. LC9S Pro - adding safety possible?
    By dennisjk in forum LC9 Technical
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 02-05-2017, 08:46 AM
  2. LC9s safety or no safety?
    By secamp32 in forum LC9 Discussion
    Replies: 99
    Last Post: 01-01-2015, 02:19 PM
  3. Lc9s thumb safety removal
    By smithnsig in forum LC9 Technical
    Replies: 17
    Last Post: 12-04-2014, 08:21 PM
  4. Replies: 4
    Last Post: 04-17-2014, 09:42 AM
  5. SR9c/SR40c - Manual Safety Discussion
    By Mayonardo in forum Semi Autos
    Replies: 40
    Last Post: 03-04-2013, 12:27 PM